No matter what topic you are researching, all things have both advantages and disadvantages in this duality. With the reporting about MMS it looks obviously in such a way that on the one hand one raises wrong accusations with the possible disadvantages or simply invents things consciously or mixes up. On the other hand one ignores and conceals however deliberately the successes and positive effects, which MMS proved many times. Obviously, this is done in order to deliberately trigger a negative emotional reaction in the viewer or reader. This is then no longer called independent journalism or open-ended reporting, but simply propaganda.

Back to the facts and some uncomfortable counter-questions to these representatives of the mass media: